Blimey, what are the BBC up to at the moment? The BBC is looking to make up the £2 billion budget shortfall, due to the less than generous rise in the license fee, in a lot of concerning places.
Yes, I believe that selling off expensive real estate and moving production and support functions out of London makes perfect sense. However, I cannot subscribe to the idea that large scale job cuts should be made in the areas of world class excellence such as the Natural History and Vision Units.
Staff in Bristol are anxiously waiting to hear if they are
part of plans to axe 2,800 jobs in the UK. BBC director general Mark Thompson is submitting his plans for the corporation's future to its governing body. Reports have surfaced that BBC staff may
have to write a 200-word memo justifying why they should keep their jobs in the light of cutbacks.
In Bristol the BBC employs about 740 staff at Whiteladies Road. Two of its departments are expected to be affected by the cuts. These include its BBC Vision department which has 450 staff and includes the Natural History Unit, and the Factual Unit, which makes programmes including Bargain Hunt.
The main changes include:
• Closing 2,500 job posts over the next six years
• Creating about 1,000 new jobs, many of which will be filled internally. In total, the BBC estimates there will be 1,800 redundancies from current staff
• Making 10% fewer original TV programmes by 2012/13, focusing on fewer, higher quality shows
• Establishing an integrated newsroom - merging TV, radio, and online
• Reducing the size of the BBC's property portfolio by selling BBC Television Centre by 2012/13
• Scrapping proposals for new activities, including plans for four new local radio stations.
I think that in the past the BBC has tried to be all things to all people, rather than focusing on its core purpose which is simply to inform, educate and entertain the British Public. I believe that the BBC has tried to follow its competition, ITV and C4, too far into the commercial and reality TV market. I would put further emphasis on the "inform and educate" part of the BBC's formal purpose, as clearly many commercial stations do not focus on this area as it is not as appealing for advertisers, so the BEEB surely is carrying out a valid service for Britain?
With the exception of the
Discovery Channel (which carries a lot of BBC content anyway), the BBC dominates the Natural History and factual programming market. It clearly is a strength and I cannot see how the organisation will benefit from making job cuts in this area. Surely the BBC earns the "lion's share" from content sold around the world from the estimated 80% of all Natural History programming worldwide? So what's the plan? Axe the next series of Blue Planet in order to roll out another cringe worthy reality TV (most probably dancing related) programme?
My plan to address the budget crisis would be to:
AXE:
1 - The ill-fated BBC i-player project
(Read about this in my blog)2 - "Reality TV" programmes.
3 - Focus on providing streamlined sports coverage. (A contact close to the BBC coverage of Rugby world cup said that the BBC team was the largest of any TV station from around the world!)
4 - The bureaucracy and red tape for which the BBC is also famous, i.e. focus job cuts in the "Professional services" department.
5 - Axe BBC3 and BBC4 as I am not sure who watches these channels to be frank!
KEEP:
1 - The Natural History unit intact and well funded.
2 - Maintain the quality and informative elements of the Vision Department.
3 - Look to keep the regional programming network for radio and TV intact and well funded.
If you are interested in contributing to this debate more please visit the Bristol Evening Post article
here and you might stand a chance of getting your views in print!
